Defining a good directory- Discuss the 'Defining a good directory' thread on FamousAgents.com |
|
Welcome to the Famous Agents Real Estate Forum. Join with others on our Real Estate Agents Forum and find out what it takes to make the extra million a year in income. What it takes to not just be one of a million, but one in a million Real Estate Agent. You are currently viewing our Real Estate Forum as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free Real Estate Agent community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our Real Estate Forum today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. |
 |
||
Defining a good directory
|
||
 |
06-21-2007, 10:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Defining a good directory
Hi guys, I wanted to create a quality quideline list for directories. I would love to hear your input on the issue and may be expand the criterias mentioned in the post a little bit.
Here is my short list 1- No reciprocal requirements, 2- Existence of authority sites already present 3- No empty category pages 4- Original coding and content of the directory. 5- No generic search terms. Is there any more to this list you would like to add??
__________________
Mert Sahinoglu is a Chicago real estate broker with Falcon Living Chicago Real Estate Brokerage Last edited by Mert : 06-21-2007 at 12:03 PM.   
|
|
06-26-2007, 10:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
Might be a little too basic - but how about the directory being indexed? Don't flame me on that one.
What about coding of the link to our sites? I know that certain links are done thru some coding that will not help our sites, just not sure of the coding. I am not referring to nofollow's.
__________________
Glenn Ginsburg 2006 FIVE STAR: Best in Client Satisfaction Naples Real Estate Agent - Gulfshore Life Magazine
|
|
06-26-2007, 01:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
The true issue is to define which site is a true directory (done for the sake of being an authority directory and which one is an SEO directory (done solely for SEO purposes). Even as basic as they are, what you say does perfect sense buddy.
|
|
07-04-2007, 04:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
Didn't Matt Cutts say something about paid directories being more worthwhile than directories that are just for SEO.
If so, then maybe paid directories should be added to the list.
|
|
07-06-2007, 07:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
I thought we were defining a good directory.
|
|
07-06-2007, 08:32 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
That's what i thought too. (Based on Mert's comment shown below)
Quote:
|
|
07-06-2007, 11:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
Yahoo.com, is 299 bucks a year, business.com 199 a year and paid and supposedly good. Google rules not mine.
Last edited by Mert : 07-06-2007 at 01:12 PM. Reason: sorry did not mean to say per month
|
|
07-06-2007, 12:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Re: Defining a good directory
Quote:
The Yahoo Directory is $299.00 per year and a listing in Business.com is $199.00 per year ($149.00 for renewals).
__________________
FamousAgents.com - Real Estate Web Design
|
Linear Mode
