[kensmith]

I had written this yesterday afternoon then my internet went down so some of it's a little behind. Will post more about the current discussion later.

Now after reading this thread a few times as there are some issues that are very important I have to agree with Matt on most points. The reason is anything that helps the big boys is not good for the consumer.

If a policy makes it more likely that consumers will call listing agents and not get full representation it isn't a good policy for the consumer.

If a policy will help those with deep pockets take more market share it isn't a good policy as it reduces competition and that always drives up prices or reduces quality. Quick example, sure Walmart sells cheap stuff, but do you think it has quality stuff?

If a policy allows middle men to step into the process easier it isn't good for the consumer. No consumer will agree that a middle man (lead generator) stepping in and adding costs to the transaction is a good thing. Those that use these services just don't understand what they are.

Anyways basically without being involved with the technical end of any of this and looking at it purely from a consumer standpoint the login requirements are good for the consumer. They actually help keep the consumers costs lower and keep competition high.

BTW, I don't think that Jim was thinking this was a advertising thread, just wanted to know why Matt likes his forum better than the other one.